I still think they should show the severe weather coverage nationally even outside of the affected area (especially for legacy STARs that are in the affected area as well as both DirecTV and Dish subscribers that are in the affected area). Because neither DirecTV nor Dish cannot beam a localized IntelliStar/IntelliStar 2 (including localized commercials and EAS messages like on most cable systems), both satellite providers would to have launch separate beams for each one of the 200 or so media markets nationwide. Think of it like the local broadcast channels and network television affiliates that both satellite providers carry (such as your local ABC, CBS, CW, Fox, NBC, PBS, etc.). That would of cost both providers millions or even billions of dollars to launch and both satellite providers doesn't even have the room to put all of that bandwidth in outer space. That's the only thing I miss from cable.
Personally, if it wasn't Comca$h's refusal to carry some of my favorite channels that they don't carry (especially when it comes to the availability of HD channels that they don't carry if they only have it in SD, I still would of been a cable subscriber. Besides, my local Comca$h system didn't even get TWC HD until around 2011 or so, DirecTV was way ahead of them.
Also, even in the severe weather affected area, your DirecTV or Dish satellite would suffer from "rain fade" anyway. Usually when there are thunderstorms, heavy downpours, or even wet heavy snow that can lose the signal. HD feeds of the same channel (including TWC) are more sensitive to "rain fade" than their SD duplicates (unless if it’s severe weather).
Even cable companies sometimes loose its signal too, but rarely in severe weather. My local Comca$h system is neglected anyway.