TWC Today Forums

TWC Today => Questions, Comments, Suggestions => Topic started by: ErnestoAlert on September 18, 2007, 10:00:45 PM

Title: "New" Content?
Post by: ErnestoAlert on September 18, 2007, 10:00:45 PM
Gary, I wanted to get your feelings on this.

This site is "TWC Today," yet, especially in the "segment openers" and "OCM Clips," there's a lack of more current TWC clips. Yeah, I know, you can turn on the TV and see all you want of that...but wouldn't including current segment openers still be a good idea?

Err...can this all be chalked up to lack of contribution?
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 18, 2007, 10:14:22 PM
Lack of contribution is part of it. But the other part of it is that, if you look throughout the site, there are actually many more current clips. I can't continue to fill the site with more current stuff, or else if and/or when I get other contributions, they won't fit. Right now, even though I'll gladly accept any contributions, I most want to find stuff from between 2000-2003. Its harder to find, and is more likely to attract people then the every day run of the mill stuff.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: Gil on September 19, 2007, 07:27:54 AM
Lack of contribution is part of it. But the other part of it is that, if you look throughout the site, there are actually many more current clips. I can't continue to fill the site with more current stuff, or else if and/or when I get other contributions, they won't fit. Right now, even though I'll gladly accept any contributions, I most want to find stuff from between 2000-2003. Its harder to find, and is more likely to attract people then the every day run of the mill stuff.
I just love you're constant use of expressions :D

I might have some things to contribute. Looking back, i was an idiot not to record more.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 19, 2007, 08:30:37 AM
Lack of contribution is part of it. But the other part of it is that, if you look throughout the site, there are actually many more current clips. I can't continue to fill the site with more current stuff, or else if and/or when I get other contributions, they won't fit. Right now, even though I'll gladly accept any contributions, I most want to find stuff from between 2000-2003. Its harder to find, and is more likely to attract people then the every day run of the mill stuff.
I just love you're constant use of expressions :D

I might have some things to contribute. Looking back, i was an idiot not to record more.

I used an expression? :unsure:
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: Localonthe8s on September 19, 2007, 10:44:19 AM
Where's the expression? :huh:
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: wxmediafan on September 20, 2007, 04:51:58 PM
I have a video of the XL, and a couple minutes of Melissa Barrington from 2003.. but, unfortuantely I have no way of getting it on here.  :-\


I think Gil was being sarcastic, in saying that Gary never uses emotions in his posts maybe?  Idk.  my guess.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 20, 2007, 04:52:44 PM
You could be right.  :D
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: Gil on September 20, 2007, 05:55:46 PM
Quote
...run of the mill stuff.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 20, 2007, 06:03:17 PM
Quote
...run of the mill stuff.

Umm...ok? Did you have a point?
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: Gil on September 20, 2007, 07:16:09 PM
Uh yes i do. its called an expression.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 20, 2007, 07:29:41 PM
Uh yes i do. its called an expression.

You didn't express anyhting. You just quoted my post....
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: Gil on September 20, 2007, 09:30:17 PM
No, i mean, what you said was an expression. When i said "I just love your use of expressions", i  was reffering to the quoted thingy. NO iw as not being sarcastic. it makes me chickle.
Title: Re: "New" Content?
Post by: lfmusiclover on September 20, 2007, 09:31:54 PM
No, i mean, what you said was an expression. When i said "I just love your use of expressions", i  was reffering to the quoted thingy. NO iw as not being sarcastic. it makes me chickle.

Ah, I understand now.  8)