601
Local Forecast / Re: 1999 LF Daytime Intro
« on: December 16, 2011, 12:57:30 AM »
Yah, it wasn't rare. I'm sure if I looked for it, I could find it in my footage.
November 04, 2025, 12:06:44 PM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
603
Local Forecast / Re: Christmas 2011 Playlist
« on: December 15, 2011, 10:26:05 AM »Which consequently is why I am not very fond of Trammells music. It's not a matter if the music is good or not, but his tunes all sound the same to me and it bores me quicklyReally? Wow! I don't think his songs sound the same at all. Well, he definitely has his own style, but the songs are different enough for me. Brian Hughes and Pat Metheny would be other examples of TWC artists whose music generally sounds the same. Ryan Farish is close to being in that group as well.
604
Local Forecast / Re: Christmas 2011 Playlist
« on: December 14, 2011, 09:47:16 PM »They play that "Carol of the Bells" song here a lot during Christmas. I was really into them for a few years. Then TWC started playing them a lot, and I got tired. They're an easy artist to get tired of since their songs sound a lot alike.I'm so sick of TSO (on TWC and radio). A few years ago I loved them, but they have been overplayed.Really? I've never heard about them until 2007 when their music first appeared on TWC's Christmas playlist
605
Local Forecast / Re: Christmas 2011 Playlist
« on: December 14, 2011, 03:48:23 PM »
I'm so sick of TSO (on TWC and radio). A few years ago I loved them, but they have been overplayed.
606
TWC Classics News / Re: TWCC Archives
« on: December 14, 2011, 12:11:08 AM »
That settles it. They will be updated. Thanks to everyone that voted!
607
TWC Classics News / Re: TWCC Archives
« on: December 13, 2011, 03:16:09 PM »If the archives were to be updated, would the old content not seen on the current layout still be on the archive section?Yes
608
TWC Classics News / Re: TWCC Archives
« on: December 13, 2011, 11:56:37 AM »
Voting closes today around 5:30pm CT. 
609
General Discussion / Re: Adam Sandler
« on: December 12, 2011, 07:01:16 PM »Yeah, "PBS Kids" had a lot of good cartoons shown during the afternoon time; I used to watch them all the time. As Eric said, even the cartoons were more intelligent than those you see on channels such as Nickelodeon or Cartoon Network today.Agreed. I think we can do without the liberal propaganda on Sesame Street, but whatever. Curious George is great. Much better than the version I watched when I was little.
610
General Discussion / Re: Adam Sandler
« on: December 12, 2011, 03:17:17 PM »PBS is for old people? Grannies watch "Sesame Street"? PBS, as you said, is for intelligent programming, though age has nothing to do with it. Children watch during the daytime, and adults watch in the evening and at night.Oh yah, I forgot about the kiddie shows. PBS has children's programming during the day and programming for old people at night.
611
General Discussion / Re: Adam Sandler
« on: December 12, 2011, 10:51:23 AM »
Poor programming and bad movies have less to do with advertising and more to do with the target audience. Adam Sandler movies are primary directed towards children and man-children. So you primarily get juvenile humor. PBS, on the other hand, is primarily directed towards old people. So the programming is more intelligent.
612
General Discussion / Re: Adam Sandler
« on: December 11, 2011, 11:31:47 PM »
Not surprising. I've never found him to be all that funny. And that movie looks terrible. It's like he's trying to be the white Tyler Perry.
613
Everything Else TWC / Re: General TWC Discussion
« on: December 10, 2011, 06:38:42 PM »
I moved into the first house of my own about a month ago. During the five or so years I was at my apartment, I was without a local forecast and didn't get TWC HD. Now that I'm in a covered area, I have Cox Cable again. I was bored today (there never seems to be anything on when I want to watch TV) and tuned to TWC. Needless to say I was amazed. Aside from the logo, three OCMs, and parts of the Intellistar, there was NOTHING about the channel that I recognized! Then I tuned into TWC HD (I had to purchase a new TV when I moved). The clarity is nice, but WOW! Talk about sensory overload!! I swear, there wasn't a graphic on it that wasn't animated! It was so rediculous that I actually laughed out loud at some of it. For example, on the 5 day outlook, there's a neon snake (as best I can describe) that goes up and down where the temperatures are listed. What exactly is the point of that? 
614
TWC Classics News / Re: TWCC Archives
« on: December 08, 2011, 10:26:18 AM »
I've added a poll (obviously), for those of you that have an opinion, but don't want to comment.
615
TWC Classics News / TWCC Archives
« on: December 06, 2011, 02:16:00 PM »
After experiencing much frustration with constant changes to sites I frequent (YouTube, Google, and Facebook), I have decided to add an "archives" area to the site. This will contain a slightly modified version of the site from last year (see attached screen shot). This way, features that no longer exist on the current site will still be available to you, such as the Way Back Play Back. The only thing I'm not able to bring back is the forums. The database backup I saved was corrupt/incomplete, leaving hundreds of topics blank.
My only question is whether or not it would make sense to update the pages that still exist. For example, there have been numerous videos added to the "local forecast" area in the past year. Would it be helpful to have those updates reflected in the archived area? Or would you prefer to use it to only view content that no longer exists?
My only question is whether or not it would make sense to update the pages that still exist. For example, there have been numerous videos added to the "local forecast" area in the past year. Would it be helpful to have those updates reflected in the archived area? Or would you prefer to use it to only view content that no longer exists?