Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
57.8°F Thunderstorm
EDIT: Beautiful Sun-shower right now. Perfect spring day
AMAZING DOUBLE RAINBOW!!!
As many here know, I'm a believer in small government.
That being said, I think the main purpose of government is to keep people safe, and the NWS does exactly that.
Now, I'm not saying that I totally disagree with the President here. Like every other government agency, I'm sure there is quite a bit of wasteful spending and some corruption within the NWS.
I remember a few years ago when talk of privatization came up and nearly everybody cried foul. As long as it's done right, private management of the NWS is not a bad idea. It would have to be government subsidized so potentially lifesaving weather information will remain free to the general public.
Bring in company A to manage the NWS. If they do a bad job, fire them and bring in company B to see if they can run it more efficiently. If not, bring on company C.
REMEMBER: GOVERNMENT IS A MONOPOLY.
They have no competition, and as a result, there really isn't any incentive to do a good job.
I know there are many dedicated government employees, but we've all encountered some who obviously don't give a crap.
This might be off-key but you people should see this is all by design, an effort to control society going on in slow motion. it is INCREMENTALISM, the primary tactic the elite are using to install the new world order. The budget cuts and other moves are small, but many of them over a long period of time will eventually cause the whole thing to come crashing down. Politicians are the mouthpieces for the CFR and the Trilateral commission who in turn answer to Bilderberg (the head of the global power structure). Obama is a mouthpiece and he is doing what he was told before he secured the nomintation. Its all a rigged game.
Sixteen more days and I'll be relaxing in San Francisco. Neither. A pound of arrogance.Wait a minute. Was I called arrogant because I said where I've heard it from or I said "Of course"? I didn't mean it in any harsh manor. It may have looked like it, I'll agree but some of you need to understand that you can't judge somebody's tone just by what they type on their keyboard. That's not my job because, technically, I can say what I want to say (with some limits), it's up to you to interpret what tone I'm using. Just understand this from here on out, I don't have an attitude towards anybody online, and I'm sorry if it appears that way. So every time when it seems like I have an attitude, I don't. Not trying to really play the blame game here, but I hope you guys understand that so there won't be further more conflict. Thanks for understanding.
Back to the game,
Yes.
What planet do we live on?
