7216
Contributions / Re: alex somers (Weatherfan90's) contribs
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:58:37 PM »
Yes, they are very nice! Thanks for contributing! :sunglasses:
May 02, 2026, 02:13:48 PM
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
7217
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:47:37 PM »You CANNOT license BMI music unless your using it for commercial purposes.then i'll license it to WJJZ, Philadelphia. It's a smooth jazz station and i know someone who works there
Can't do that unless YOU work there.
7218
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:41:03 PM »
You CANNOT license BMI music unless your using it for commercial purposes.
7219
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:35:53 PM »
It's safe to say that's probably not the case. Since so many people have tried and gotten the same result, that's probably his usual attitude.
7220
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:29:28 PM »
3 or 4 years ago.
7221
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:24:33 PM »I like Andrew Korus. I've been looking for that song for more than two years now, but had no luck. I heard that Hello There is the only song he made.Carlos said Andrew Korus called him a mother! :shocked:
Yep, he did.
BTW, I think that Andrew Korus song is very cheery.
7222
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 08:18:37 PM »
Thunder, suffice it to say that your not being truthful when you say you don't like jazz. 
7223
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 06:35:38 PM »
I don't think he intended it to be mean. 
And if you don't like smooth jazz, how did you ever become so knowledgeable about TWC's music?
And if you don't like smooth jazz, how did you ever become so knowledgeable about TWC's music?
7224
TWC Today News / Re: Site News
« on: January 14, 2008, 06:34:36 PM »
Yes, Mike. I deleted his post. :sunglasses:
7225
OCMs & Personalities / Re: Dennis Smith gone?
« on: January 14, 2008, 06:34:13 PM »
Dennis has been with TWC since it came on the air in 1982.
Thanks for the info Mike. :sunglasses:
Thanks for the info Mike. :sunglasses:
7226
OCMs & Personalities / Dennis Smith gone?
« on: January 14, 2008, 05:37:31 PM »
I waas just over at TWC's bio pages to try and find a bio for Dennis Smith (I'm making a bio for hi here, so I need info), but noticed that he doesn't have a bio there anymore. Is he no longer with TWC? :shocked:
7227
TWC Today News / Re: Site News
« on: January 14, 2008, 05:04:12 PM »
That method seems A LOT more complicated, especially if only for the sake of making our stores different looking.
I won't continue with the issue on Bill's board. That's not for discussion here. Let's leave that over there. :sunglasses:
Ahem, Mike.
I won't continue with the issue on Bill's board. That's not for discussion here. Let's leave that over there. :sunglasses:
BTW, when I pointed out the similarities between my store and his, I wasn't saying that he intentionally stole my idea. I was just saying that they were awfully similar.
Ahem, Mike.
7228
General Discussion / Re: The Pot Belly Stove
« on: January 14, 2008, 04:15:07 PM »Your looking at everyone. This is pretty much the norm any more. Why? Beats me. But its got to pick up or else I'm throwing in the towel. we had our worst month ever last month. I'm not paying for that.I have midyear exams coming up soon so I might not be on as much. That might be the case with others too, which could be the reason why activity is lower than normal. Just give it another month and see how it goes. I'd hate to see this site go because I have very little interest in the pre-2000 days of TWC.
You may not have an interest in pre-2000 TWC, but it seems that you and many others are as active, if not more so, on TWCC's 2000-present boards than you are here. The one thing you all can do to show me that this site means something to you guys is to use it as THE source for everything TWC 2000-present. I don't mean to sound harsh towards Matt, but he does just fine with all of his pre 2000 stuff. He won't be hurting if you stop using his site/forum for 2000-present stuff. Many of you guys have (or at least had) links to TWCT in your sigs over there. that's another thing you all could do to help and to show some interest and support. If you don't have a link in your sig on other weather/TWC sites, put one there! Show your TWCT spirit! You all have no problem showing your loyalty to TWCC. Let's show some for TWCT! :sunglasses:
I am more than willing to give it more time. But here's the thing: this ain't a free ride for me anymore. I'm now paying to have this site up. And I also pay for the very domain this site resides in. I at least want to feel as though I'm not just throwing my money into a black hole. And when I look at the stats and see that the general trend has been downward over the pat few month's, it sends up a red flag.
Loyalty? What the heck was I thinking! Matt need only say a word to get the troops rallying 'round him. Sometimes you guys are the most disloyal bunch I've ever met.
For those who are wondering: yep, I'm pissed.
7229
TWC Today News / Re: Site News
« on: January 14, 2008, 04:09:38 PM »
Mike, I remain steadfast about the fact that I didn't copy Matt. He doesn't own the rights to that design. And unfortunately, there's no better one. I refuse to allow my site to suffer because I have to use inferior designs because of the childishness of another. Of course, Mike, you know I have always urged you to leave if you don't like it here. But while we're at it, doyou have any better ideas for the store?
7230
TWC Today News / Re: Site News
« on: January 14, 2008, 03:43:20 PM »
A person with passion also does things the way he believes is the best. In this case, your way was the best. At least in my opinion. Its well organized, and easy to navigate. So, yes, you may take it as a compliment, because in essence that's what it is. I'm interested, though, in how using what really is the only way to make a store can be copying. Can you come up with a better solution? I am also quite intrigued at the fact that your attempting to use now the same argument that I used against you at Bill's forum-that being that you put words in my mouth. 
BTW, my comment earlier was sarcastic, as yours was. Since you did not elaborate any, all I had to go on was what you said. So I used sarcasm to make that point, which you obviously didn't catch.
BTW BTW, I've been an Amazon.com affiliate since 1999, so in technicality I've had access to their services for a very long time. But being web illiterate as you clearly know I am, though, I didn't know how to go about actually making a music store until I saw yours. Thus I had kind of a DUH moment, realizing that it was not difficult at all.
BTW BTW BTW, I e-mailed you earlier about some issues. Did you get my message?
BTW, my comment earlier was sarcastic, as yours was. Since you did not elaborate any, all I had to go on was what you said. So I used sarcasm to make that point, which you obviously didn't catch.
BTW BTW, I've been an Amazon.com affiliate since 1999, so in technicality I've had access to their services for a very long time. But being web illiterate as you clearly know I am, though, I didn't know how to go about actually making a music store until I saw yours. Thus I had kind of a DUH moment, realizing that it was not difficult at all.
BTW BTW BTW, I e-mailed you earlier about some issues. Did you get my message?