Messages

646

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 27, 2008, 12:29:10 AM »

I find it weird that the newspaper company would let a 16 year old put something in there papers. Wouldn't he need to have parental permission first?

647

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:52:02 PM »

Just out of curiosity, is Andrew a member of this forum, and if so, is his user name apoecker? Robomayhem posted like he was Andrew, so I thought Andrew may have changed his username.

he is a member. He was last active yesterday.

(Source: Search System)
I think that I am catching onto martins advice

648

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:47:40 PM »

How did Gil find the article , in the first place?

I got it in a Google News Alert e-mail. Probably how Gil got it too.

As for Curt's qualifications, I'll say this: usually it takes alot of experience and knowledge to label yourself an expert, specialist, or anything else. I'm pretty sure that at 12 he has little of either.

This is not anything against you Curt. I'm talking about titles in general, not just yours.

It's fine! I know that it will take allot of work before I fully expect to master this.

OT: I think that I need to reread what I am typing... I am making allot of errors in my posts.

649

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:43:47 PM »

That so called "12-year-old" happens to be me I am not a full-fledged environmentalist. I happen to procrastinate on this part of the project, and I only go on to tell you how to same money

If you dont mind me asking, what makes you qualified to give people info on how to save money? Where is your info comming from?

And let me add that prephaps my previous post were a little harsh and I do apologize for that. However I stand by everything I posted and commented on.

I also would like to add that I think this article is misleading, contains false information and promotes illegal actions (copyright infringment) as such I have reported it to that paper.

I agree with you Martin, and I accept the apology

The source of where this is coming from is many websites that I find correct, and some posters around my school that they made

The newspaper article... I had nothing to do with it. Talk to Andrew (apoecker) about it.

650

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:21:10 PM »

How did Gil find the article , in the first place?

Possibly on the SS8 homepage. The link is there, too

651

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:16:42 PM »

Right you are. I DID say that, and I do mean it. I just don't think he should be allowed to do some of the things he does.

652

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 11:00:33 PM »

I thought that you want him on the curb before (On the 1st page of the thread). Well, I should take a break of posting in this thread to let other users also post 

653

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 10:51:43 PM »

narunetto, those are my sentiments exactly.

Curt, did you ever wonder if maybe its not such a good idea to call yourself something your not?

Actually, yes. I wasn't the one who put that in the paper. I had nothing to even do with it. It was all Andrew (I know what you think about him, Gary ) who put it together, as far as I know.

Its pretty ballsy of him to give people false (read misleading) titles. My mouth just hangs agape at the thought that Jeremy allows these things to happen. How could he?

Now you want to throw him on the curb and hopes that the trash man throws him in the back of the truck?

654

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 10:38:19 PM »

narunetto, those are my sentiments exactly.

Curt, did you ever wonder if maybe its not such a good idea to call yourself something your not?

Actually, yes. I wasn't the one who put that in the paper. I had nothing to even do with it. It was all Andrew (I know what you think about him, Gary ) who put it together, as far as I know.

655

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 10:32:04 PM »

EDIT: I realize this is probably not a popular decision with some, but that's just the way it'll have to be. I've been known to make unpopular decisions from time to time. 

For once I'm going to agree with your decision.

I second that

656

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 10:30:49 PM »

What the  indeed.

I bet the 12-year-old is struggling in his pre-algebra class rather than being a full-fledged environmental specialist. If he comes on my 11:00 news, I'd be switching to another channel.

That so called "12-year-old" happens to be me I am not a full-fledged environmentalist. I happen to procrastinate on this part of the project, and I only go on to tell you how to same money

657

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 10:05:40 PM »

I am also a beta tester at SilverStar 8. I disagree with most of the points stated in that article. I can also see how The Weather Channel would have an issue with it, one example is their WeatherSTAR Technology, It was licensed to The Weather Network and Pelmorex for their Local Forecast Device (Whatever its called), so the idea is clearly patented and would be illegal to copy without a license to do so.

Exactly. patent #5940776 to be exact.

Andrew didn't post correctly and he acted like an retard while making the article. It didn't make scence in many ways.

658

TWC Fan Art / Re: License Plates

« on: December 26, 2008, 04:03:21 PM »

Can you make Michigan?

659

Local Forecast / Re: Shadowfax - Night Passage

« on: December 26, 2008, 03:51:33 PM »

Wow! Alot of information in one post

660

General Discussion / Re: WTF!!!!

« on: December 26, 2008, 02:33:19 PM »

"A 12-year-old environmental specialist from Michigan"
That sentence is wrong in so many ways. Whoever this writer is must be a retard. This is horrible writing.

Although they would be reffering to me, I will say this... I completely disagree with what they **cough** Andrew **cough**  put in this paper article. I am not a "enviormental specialist", since I never even studied this subject. I am just going online to help people out with saving money and all of that. But I really do disagree with that statement in the newspaper 100 percent...