Here's another arcticle that discusses that DirecTV agreed to a deal with TWC on one condition: slashing reality programming in half with live programming in it's place.
The good thing about this settlement is that it not only benefits those who have DirecTV by allowing them to once again watch TWC, but it also helps out the newly-minted non-DirecTV cable subscribers by improving the TWC experience for them.
Why DirecTV? Why?! Something tells me that TWC is likely lying about promising to restore more live weather coverage now that DirecTV has reached a new deal. Great, more money out of our DirecTV bills.
It goes to show that "permanent" channel drops don't go that far. I gather that there is a sizable community out there which disapproved of DTV dropping TWC, with some even going as far as to claim they switched providers over the move. Those viewers would supposedly be thrilled to be able to watch TWC on DTV, except for the fact that they've already switched. Does DTV expect to magically get them back?
The only real leverage gained here is that DirecTV now airs a competitor against TWC when there were previously none.
Competition is generally a good thing. WN certainly seemed good to me at the time because TWC had gone downhill, but that was before this dispute came to a head. Even immediately before and just after TWC's forced exit from DTV, the channel made a considerable effort to trim the longform back in exchange for live coverage. TWC is the established network here with the name recognition, and if that constant gets coupled with improvements, WN will suddenly pale in comparison.