811
Everything Else TWC / Re: Why The Weather Channel is Naming Winter Storms
« on: October 02, 2012, 03:54:42 PM »Craig, I'm fine with naming big winter storms after they occur. I'm not a fan of seeing someone wasting precious time trying to decide if a highly uncertain and complex winter storm should be named before it happens. The public only wants to know what's going to happen, how much will fall, when will it start and end, and what should they do. Besides, what would we define as the naming criteria for a developing winter storm? Pressure and winds alone won't work. You have to consider so many other factors.
Furthermore, you're taking a huge risk of downplaying unnamed winter storms before they create disasters. A small area of low pressure could trigger 1/2" of ice from freezing drizzle over Atlanta, or a small Alberta clipper could set up lake-effect bands that dump 1'-2' of snow and cause blizzard conditions in Chicago. These hypothetical systems would never be named before they happened as they're so subtle, but they would create a nightmare for those cities that names may be needed after the fact.
I see your point. I think I have came to conclusion but I'd like to see their criteria for naming specific storms. It should be interesting what the criteria is and I wonder if it varies from region to region.