I don't watch ABC News often, but I saw a report this evening about a Minnesota Doctor who doesn't require his patients to have health insurance, they just pay cash as they visit, the only exception he said was of pregnant women and people with disabilities that require more frequent visits. I brought this up because they mention in the report, what if that was the proposal of the bill, what if you weren't required to have health insurance, but still be able to afford full health coverage and not deal with additional costs. Do any of you think that would that make the bill any better or just worse or no effect at all?