TWC Today Forums

Other => General Discussion => Topic started by: Tyler on November 01, 2010, 05:32:50 PM

Title: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Tyler on November 01, 2010, 05:32:50 PM
I know some of you aren't old enough to vote, but may still take an interest in politics. So, if you are eligible to vote, will you tomorrow?

I already did my absentee ballot and returned it. In Pennsylvania, there are a few big races being watched. Governor Rendell is not running for reelection, and it's a pretty close race between (D) Dan Onorato and (R) Tom Corbett, who surprisingly are both from Pittsburgh. Dan Onorato is the current Allegheny County Executive, and Tom Corbett the current Attorney General. The other big race is the (R) Pat Toomey and (D) Joe Sestak, which in my opinion is also too close to call.

What are the big races in your area?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Lightning on November 01, 2010, 06:01:09 PM
I am above the age of 18, which means I am elgible to vote and will do so in tomorrow's election. The governor's race in Alabama, I am not too happy about. As always, my choice in the lesser of two evils. Neither candidate are conservatives, Ron Sparks (D) and Robert Bently (R). I am considering writing in the candidate I voted for in the primary earlier this year.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 01, 2010, 06:03:50 PM
I will be voting first thing in the morning before heading to school.

I really HATE talking about politics publicly, but there's one issue that worries me for the sake of my college: Measure J. Basically it means "IVC wants more money". and they'll spend the money to modernize the whole campus so they can give future students benefits of a better campus. I say, wtf...what about the students of the PRESENT? I'll be leaving the school if that measure passes.

Anyways, in CA, the huge races here are for Governor and for the CA Senate. Last time I heard, Attorney General Jerry Brown (D) is leading the polls by 10 points, ahead of former eBay CEO Meg Whitman (R). For Senate, Barbara Boxer, is leading against former HP CEO Carly Fiorina by 4 points.

Tomorrow is going to be a looooooong day. 
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 01, 2010, 06:38:15 PM
I wish I could vote because this midterm election is very important especially our governor race between Roy Barnes (D) and Nathan Deal (R) it's pretty close, close enough to be a run off if Deal doesn't get the 50% or higher percentage to win (God I hope he doesn't) but unfortunately I'm about 22 days too late, I don't turn 18 until the 24th.  :(
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 01, 2010, 06:45:42 PM
I don't turn 18 until the 20th, and I wish I could vote in the South Carolina governer's race. The battle Jim DeMint and the no-name, no-political background Democrat? Well, you can probably guess who's winning that one.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 01, 2010, 07:09:10 PM
I don't turn 18 until the 20th, and I wish I could vote in the South Carolina governer's race. The battle Jim DeMint and the no-name, no-political background Democrat? Well, you can probably guess who's winning that one.

I think it would be pretty funny if he actually won  :lol:, I haven't been paying much attention to him recently, but I'm still baffled as to how he got on the ballot. Didn't he have some kind of an indictment pending on him?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 01, 2010, 07:21:21 PM
So, if you are eligible to vote, will you tomorrow?

What are the big races in your area?
Heck yah! I don't think there are any "big" races in my area, though. However, in 2012, Senator Ben Nelson will (likely) be running for re-election. Assuming we get a conservative to run against him, that will probably be a tight race. Then again, maybe not. He was one of the Democrats that caved on the healthcare bill at the last minute, earlier this year. And from what I understand, there are numerous Democrats (who voted for him) that weren't happy about that.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Localonthe8s on November 01, 2010, 07:26:20 PM
I wish i could vote too but NJ afaik, isn't having any major elections.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 01, 2010, 07:35:51 PM
I wish I could vote because this midterm election is very important especially our governor race between Roy Barnes (D) and Nathan Deal (R) it's pretty close, close enough to be a run off if Deal doesn't get the 50% or higher percentage to win (God I hope he doesn't) but unfortunately I'm about 22 days too late, I don't turn 18 until the 24th.  :(

I forgot to mention the race for Attorney General Ken Hodges (D) and Sam Olens (R) iirc is getting tight, the race for Lt. Governor of GA I'm not sure how it's looking right now, but I think the democrat nominee Carol Porter might beat her Republican opponent Casey Cagle who's up for reelection. Maybe it's just me, but there is some serious overkill with all the republican candidates ads here, I hardly see any from democrats except for those running for gov. and attorney general. I saw an ad from a republican candidate running for agricultural commissioner, I didn't know such a thing existed.  :blink:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 01, 2010, 07:45:53 PM
I don't turn 18 until the 20th, and I wish I could vote in the South Carolina governer's race. The battle Jim DeMint and the no-name, no-political background Democrat? Well, you can probably guess who's winning that one.

I think it would be pretty funny if he actually won  :lol:
Funny? Really? :huh:

I don't know about you, but I certainly don't want that kind of power in the hands of someone that's crazy. :o
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 01, 2010, 07:55:02 PM
I don't turn 18 until the 20th, and I wish I could vote in the South Carolina governer's race. The battle Jim DeMint and the no-name, no-political background Democrat? Well, you can probably guess who's winning that one.

I think it would be pretty funny if he actually won  :lol:
Funny? Really? :huh:

I don't know about you, but I certainly don't want that kind of power in the hands of someone that's crazy. :o

I wouldn't either, but he shouldn't have been allowed to run in the first place.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 01, 2010, 09:04:13 PM
I wish i could vote too but NJ afaik, isn't having any major elections.
You do know that every House seat is up for election
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mike M on November 01, 2010, 09:33:18 PM
I wish i could vote too but NJ afaik, isn't having any major elections.
Wait until 2013, you and I can probably both expect a HUGE governor election after all the actions Christie has done in his nine months in office so far.

This video is so true... :(
Stop attacking teachers and education, and start funding our schools (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKnKI3OYqhk#ws)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 01, 2010, 10:00:24 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 01, 2010, 10:59:26 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.  Yes, tomorrow will be a great day. For the democrats!!! We got a bunch of surprises up our sleeves tomorrow.  :yes: I will be so happy to see the haters eat crow!  :rofl2:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 01, 2010, 11:03:00 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.  Yes, tomorrow will be a great day. For the democrats!!! We got a bunch of surprises up our sleeves tomorrow.  :yes:

Amen.  :clap:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 01, 2010, 11:12:21 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.  Yes, tomorrow will be a great day. For the democrats!!! We got a bunch of surprises up our sleeves tomorrow.  :yes: I will be so happy to see the haters eat crow!  :rofl2:

Hold your horses there. You're gonna anger some people with that attitude.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 01, 2010, 11:22:02 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.  Yes, tomorrow will be a great day. For the democrats!!! We got a bunch of surprises up our sleeves tomorrow.  :yes: I will be so happy to see the haters eat crow!  :rofl2:

Hold your horses there. You're gonna anger some people with that attitude.

I am just responding to someone's own political position with my own political position.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 02, 2010, 12:17:12 AM
Hold your horses there. You're gonna anger some people with that attitude.
No worries. We are all civil Americans and I LOVE talking politics :) Everyone is welcome to voice their opinions/views as long as it doesn't resort to dirty attacks. I don't think any of us will do that. I applaud that people with different views can have rational debates over issues.  :clap:

Well if the country truly believes the Republicans and tea party candidates are wrong then their votes will show it. One thing I can't stand though is hearing folks on the media call the voters ignorant or stupid. I firmly believe Americans are above that and if what they are saying is true, then isn't it the media who has failed to get the facts out?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Tyler on November 02, 2010, 01:02:49 AM
What have your local stations been doing as far as extended coverage? For the past week, the three big ones here, KDKA, WPXI, and WTAE, all have extended their 11pm newscasts to an hour in length, to truly get down to what is and isn't true about each candidate, which I think it neat. WTAE also extended their noon newscasts as well. Tomorrow they all plan break-ins throughout the night, as well as live coverage from WPXI on PCNC. I'll definitely be glued to the TV tomorrow night.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Zach on November 02, 2010, 05:37:46 AM
Floridian politics are screwed if the republican candidates get elected  :whistling: (not that republicans are bad in general, but just the two that are running for FL governor and FL senate)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 08:09:19 AM
Eh, no indiciment, I believe. He's just been living with his parents and for some reason, the Democrats nominated him. It really pissed off the National Democratic Committee, who tried to get the guy off the ballot, but he's staying in (essentially guarenteeing a Republican Senator).
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 08:30:34 AM
So here is what each party faces today:

SENATE
Pre-election, 59 seats are occupied by the Democrats, while 41 are filled by the GOP. The Democrats can afford to lose 8 seats and still have a majority, while the Republicans must win 10 to overthrow the Democrats. 37 seats are up to change.

HOUSE
Every single seat in the house is up for a vote. Out of 435 seats, one party must take at least 218 seats to have a majority.

GOVERNER
37 states have their governer elections today.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 02, 2010, 09:46:04 AM
What have your local stations been doing as far as extended coverage? For the past week, the three big ones here, KDKA, WPXI, and WTAE, all have extended their 11pm newscasts to an hour in length, to truly get down to what is and isn't true about each candidate, which I think it neat. WTAE also extended their noon newscasts as well. Tomorrow they all plan break-ins throughout the night, as well as live coverage from WPXI on PCNC. I'll definitely be glued to the TV tomorrow night.

As far as I see, KTLA (CW affiliate) is a great source to watch the Election coverage. They have reporters scattered all over the state (even one in Sacramento and one here in my area). All the others are not so much. I'd rather watch KTLA than any other news affiliate. Their newscasts will be 90% election coverage and 10% other news.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Al on November 02, 2010, 10:00:36 AM

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.  Yes, tomorrow will be a great day. For the democrats!!! We got a bunch of surprises up our sleeves tomorrow.  :yes: I will be so happy to see the haters eat crow!  :rofl2:

Agreed. The republicans are responsible for the situation we're in now, Democrats historically have been able to turn the worst economic situation around, unfortunately, that is not the case. I will not be participating in elections due to lack of time, even interest at the time.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 02, 2010, 10:48:06 AM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.
OMG, I am SO sick of hearing that B.S. (FYI - I'm directing my anger at the Dems and the liberal media, not you)!! Yes, it's true, the Bush era Republicans screwed up on a lot of things. Medicare Part D, the border, and No Child Left Behind to name a few. But let's not forget that the economy was doing fairly well (except around 9/11) until Pelosi came into power in 2007. People seem to think that the President is solely responsible for the economy. Not so. More often than not, it's the congress. So when people talk about the "Clinton boom" and the "Bush recession," what they should really be talking about is the Gingrich boom and Pelosi recession. Like it or not, the President has had almost two years to fix things, the Congress has had almost four. Things are clearly not getting better. So we have two options, we can vote for more of the same or try a new batch of Republicans. Personally, I'd rather take a chance on the Republicans. I mean, most Democrats won't even acknowledge that there's a problem. They mock us for daring to complain or disagree with them. And they expect us to reward them for that? I don't think so!

As a side note, what we Tea Party activists are trying to do is elect new Republicans that are true conservatives. We are NOT trying to elect or re-elect the Republicans that ran things during the Bush years. Those were mainly progressives (who aren't much different than the liberal progressives currently in power). And progressives are bad! :club: So when you hear the President or one of his supporters saying that we want to go back to the way things were, he's full of it. I don't know a single conservative that wants to go back to the way things were. We want LIMITED government. Period.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 02, 2010, 10:55:28 AM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.
OMG, I am SO sick of hearing that B.S. (FYI - I'm directing my anger at the Dems and the liberal media, not you)!! Yes, it's true, the Bush era Republicans screwed up on a lot of things. Medicare Part D, the border, and No Child Left Behind to name a few. But let's not forget that the economy was doing fairly well (except around 9/11) until Pelosi came into power in 2007. People seem to think that the President is solely responsible for the economy. Not so. More often than not, it's the congress. So when people talk about the "Clinton boom" and the "Bush recession," what they should really be talking about is the Gingrich boom and Pelosi recession. Like it or not, the President has had almost two years to fix things, the Congress has had almost four. Things are clearly not getting better. So we have two options, we can vote for more of the same or try a new batch of Republicans. Personally, I'd rather take a chance on the Republicans. I mean, most Democrats won't even acknowledge that there's a problem. They mock us for daring to complain or disagree with them. And they expect us to reward them for that? I don't think so!

As a side note, what we Tea Party activists are trying to do is elect new Republicans that are true conservatives. We are NOT trying to elect or re-elect the Republicans that ran things during the Bush years. Those were mainly progressives (who aren't much different than the liberal progressives currently in power). And progressives are bad! :club: So when you hear the President or one of his supporters saying that we want to go back to the way things were, he's full of it. I don't know a single conservative that wants to go back to the way things were. We want LIMITED government. Period.

Wow, you're a tea party activist?!   :rofl2: No matter how you slice it, all this so-called "tea party" is is just the group of people that never voted for President Obama, and will never support him anyway. Plus, the arguement about the liberal media is such BS.  :hammer: There is not a liberal media. That is just a lame excuse.  All of the networks over at least the last week have been celebrating the supposed victory by the Republicans.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 02, 2010, 05:20:00 PM

In regards to this election, we have given the Democrats a chance to turn things around and its clear that was a poor decision. Tomorrow will be a great day!

That is what you think. But not this time!   :nono: The republicans screwed America over big time for 8 years, forcing us into the worst recession in any of our lifetimes, and we have only just started to recover from that mess.
OMG, I am SO sick of hearing that B.S. (FYI - I'm directing my anger at the Dems and the liberal media, not you)!! Yes, it's true, the Bush era Republicans screwed up on a lot of things. Medicare Part D, the border, and No Child Left Behind to name a few. But let's not forget that the economy was doing fairly well (except around 9/11) until Pelosi came into power in 2007. People seem to think that the President is solely responsible for the economy. Not so. More often than not, it's the congress. So when people talk about the "Clinton boom" and the "Bush recession," what they should really be talking about is the Gingrich boom and Pelosi recession. Like it or not, the President has had almost two years to fix things, the Congress has had almost four. Things are clearly not getting better. So we have two options, we can vote for more of the same or try a new batch of Republicans. Personally, I'd rather take a chance on the Republicans. I mean, most Democrats won't even acknowledge that there's a problem. They mock us for daring to complain or disagree with them. And they expect us to reward them for that? I don't think so!

As a side note, what we Tea Party activists are trying to do is elect new Republicans that are true conservatives. We are NOT trying to elect or re-elect the Republicans that ran things during the Bush years. Those were mainly progressives (who aren't much different than the liberal progressives currently in power). And progressives are bad! :club: So when you hear the President or one of his supporters saying that we want to go back to the way things were, he's full of it. I don't know a single conservative that wants to go back to the way things were. We want LIMITED government. Period.

Wow, you're a tea party activist?!   :rofl2:
You are a democrat?  :rofl2: :rofl2: I don't think it is kind of you to laugh at someone for their beliefs. That was a bit rude.

In any case I just got back from volunteering at my local polling station for 5hrs. I live in a liberal district and I can safely say it will be a big night for republicans! :)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 02, 2010, 06:57:51 PM
All that glitters is not gold. Time will tell.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 07:15:28 PM
ELECTION UPDATE: 7:10 PM EDT.

SENATE
Patrick Leahy (D) is projected to win in Vermont.
Jim DeMint (R) is projected to win in South Carolina.
Rand Paul (R) is projected to win in Kentucky.
Dan Coats (R) is projected to win in Indiana. PARTY CHANGE.

Republicans have 26 seats, the Democrats 41.

HOUSE
Vermont has given its single congressional seat to the Democrats.
Indiana has handed 3 of its 9 congressional seats to Republicans.
Kentucky has given 2 of its 6 seats to Republicans.
Georgia has handed 3 of the 13 seats to Republicans.

Democrats have 1 seat, Republicans have 10.

More results coming soon.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: tpirfan28 on November 02, 2010, 07:19:45 PM
Coats did indeed create a party change, but he was not up against an incumbent.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCmatthew on November 02, 2010, 07:24:15 PM
I think Rich Snyder, (R) will win governor of Michigan, he just had more publicity. Also, I think Rob Steele will win Senator position against 55 year Michigan Senator John Dingell (84 years old.)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 02, 2010, 07:56:58 PM
For those interested, you can watch ABC stream election coverage on Governor, Senate, and House races on their website from the link below starting at 8pm EDT. Just click on the results tab under the article on the main page and click "watch live." They will come back on air at 9:30pm for those who want to watch it live on TV.

http://abcnews.go.com/ (http://abcnews.go.com/)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 02, 2010, 10:01:39 PM
Senate
47 (D)  39 (R) - Democrats expected to take control

House
117 (D)  153 (R) - Republicans expected to take control

Also Nancy Pelosi has lost her job as House Speaker. (Although I'm not surprised, the Healthcare blowup was her demise) :(
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Tyler on November 02, 2010, 10:28:37 PM
CNN and the AP are now projecting GOP candidate Tom Corbett as the new governor of the Commonwealth. I was really hoping for Democrat Dan Onorato to win.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 10:30:52 PM
Things are looking different on CNN.

Senate
Democrats have 47 seats, 41 seats with the Republicans. For some reason, race too close to tell.

House
Democrats have 90 seats, Republicans have 137. Republicans expected to win.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 10:59:52 PM
Seven states with Democratic governers (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Tennessee, Oklahoma, Kansas, New Mexico, and Wyoming) have brought in Republican governers.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 11:11:23 PM
Early results show that California's new senator is going to be....REPUBLICAN?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: gt1racerlHDl on November 02, 2010, 11:15:38 PM
As expected Deval Patrick retains his Gov seat...

http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/governor/results/ (http://www.boston.com/news/special/politics/2010/governor/results/)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 02, 2010, 11:21:37 PM
Early results show that California's new senator is going to be....REPUBLICAN?

I'll be public here: I hope she wins. I don't want Boxer back in the Senate.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 02, 2010, 11:25:06 PM
Nothing wrong with being public. Personally, I'm just surprised, seeing how Democratic California has been period for such a long time.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 02, 2010, 11:51:22 PM
No republicans expected to win the senate. I like how the media is acting like its a big deal they didn't get it

Nothing wrong with being public. Personally, I'm just surprised, seeing how Democratic California has been period for such a long time.
Seriously? Surprised the most liberal state in America remains in the hands of the democrats?

I'll be public here: I hope she wins. I don't want Boxer back in the Senate.
Sadly both of those women are horrible. Fiorina was horrible at HP and Boxer is beyond words! Sorry Ana but it looks like Boxer won. Shame
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 02, 2010, 11:58:53 PM
Well although a run off was expected here in GA for the Governor race, Nathan Deal (R) won. VERY Disappointed. Republicans pretty much swept every race in GA except for two house seats that stayed democratic.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 03, 2010, 12:16:31 AM
It's okay, Martin. I thought Fiorina got some potential. Oh well, it is what it is.

In other words... at 20% precincts, Jerry Brown will return to the governor's seat. Proposition 19 (legalizing marijuana) is heading towards a defeat. (YAY!!) 
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 03, 2010, 12:52:26 AM
I am really disappointed Harry Reid is going to remain in office.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 03, 2010, 01:03:31 AM
I am really disappointed Harry Reid is going to remain in office.

I am very happy Harry Reid is going to remain in office.  :thrilled:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 03, 2010, 01:23:16 AM
I am disappointed at this election. At least Jerry Brown has been elected to the governor's office again. That's good news.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 03, 2010, 02:19:52 AM
I am disappointed at this election. At least Jerry Brown has been elected to the governor's office again. That's good news.
Time will tell! While I am strongly conservative in my views I don't agree with everything the republicans do. I do believe though that having one party dominate the presidency, house and senate is unbalanced. Lets see what new ideas are brought into our government and if campaign promises are kept
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: phw115wvwx on November 03, 2010, 03:18:36 AM
Honestly, I just wish there was far more cooperation among all politicians.  It should be clear that it's going to take an entire group effort from everyone to solve all the issues plaguing our country.  No offense to you all who like politics, but I'm personally sick of it due to all the arguing, debating, and lack of action.  Instead of trying to polarize this nation further, how about we finally put aside our differences and start realizing that we do have things in common and work together to solve everything using facts, numbers, and scientific proof instead of biased opinions and subjective "my way or the highway" thoughts?  That's my pleading cry to everyone who was elected tonight irregardless of what party they represent.

As you can tell, I've been extremely wary about this thread, and I'm glad you all kept it peaceful.  I sadly have no more patience for political fights.  Lately, I just can't enjoy elections, and I really don't know how you all can. :(
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mike M on November 03, 2010, 06:28:05 AM
I don't have time for politics, nor do I believe in political parties. There's too many other stuff going on in my life that's far more important.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: wxmediafan on November 03, 2010, 07:59:50 AM
Mike, that's too bad.  I think everyone should care what goes on in the political world.

I'll be honest, I have absolutely no opinion on anyone.  While I do work in the news industry, I couldn't tell you anything about any of the candidates.  I just have not been able to get into this election.  Usually I am.  I wish I cared, but I honestly do not.  I am surprised, however, that Illinois is leaning more to the right than the left.

Maybe I'd be more interested if every commercial was not a political ad bashing another politician.  How about some  POSITIVE ad's from politians telling the viewer why voting for them will make a difference.
Thank God it's over.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 03, 2010, 10:39:34 AM
I am very happy Harry Reid is going to remain in office.  :thrilled:

I guess voters took him seriously when he said "but for me, we'd be in a world-wide depression."

http://www.breitbart.tv/reid-but-for-me-wed-be-in-world-wide-depression/ (http://www.breitbart.tv/reid-but-for-me-wed-be-in-world-wide-depression/)

:facepalm:

On one hand, Harry Reid is a disgrace. On the other hand, I wonder what violence by the union workers would've occurred had he'd lost, as he promised them much (and they spent much to elect and re-elect him). :hmm:

So what has Harry Reid done for you, TampaMillTWC88?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 03, 2010, 10:41:34 AM
I am disappointed at this election. At least Jerry Brown has been elected to the governor's office again. That's good news.

Yah, always good to have someone in office that has no plan.

Jerry Brown "it's all a lie... I didn't have a plan for California" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIlzYD4tk78#)

:facepalm:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 03, 2010, 10:53:46 AM
I am disappointed at this election. At least Jerry Brown has been elected to the governor's office again. That's good news.

Yah, always good to have someone in office that has no plan.

Jerry Brown "it's all a lie... I didn't have a plan for California" ([url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIlzYD4tk78#[/url])

:facepalm:


I will not comment.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 03, 2010, 11:21:43 AM
I don't have time for politics, nor do I believe in political parties. There's too many other stuff going on in my life that's far more important.
You sound like me two years ago. I was once naive in thinking that I don't have to participate in politics. That there wasn't much of a difference between the parties. That the media wasn't biased. And that there was no such thing as an "evil" politician.

Boy was I in for a rude awakening! As sad as it may seem, there are politicians out there that just want power. They don't give a damn about you or this country. All they want is to be re-elected. And they'll make whatever deals they can to get re-elected (with the help of donations from big corporations and unions).

Like it or not, our freedom isn't a done deal. We have to keep fighting for it. Both in war and in elections. To quote Ben Franklin, when a woman asked him what he and the founding fathers had given them, "a Republic, if you can keep it."

So unless you're okay with politicians deciding what doctor you can see, what college you can go to, what food you can eat, etc, I urge you (and everyone else that "doesn't care") to get involved! It doesn't matter which "side" you pick, just make sure you know what you believe, educate yourself on history of both parties, pay attention to what's going on, and vote! :thumbsup:

And for the love of sanity, please don't use The Daily Show and/or The Colbert Report as your primary source for news. :nono:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: gt1racerlHDl on November 03, 2010, 01:13:29 PM
All these wins say the big "cats" got what they wanted  :thumbdown:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Tyler on November 03, 2010, 01:26:11 PM
I don't have time for politics, nor do I believe in political parties. There's too many other stuff going on in my life that's far more important.
And that sir, is partly why this country is in the shitter.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 03, 2010, 04:13:18 PM
I don't have time for politics, nor do I believe in political parties. There's too many other stuff going on in my life that's far more important.

Mike, are you saying that because you're annoyed by the dirty, negative ways politics have been the past couple of years or do you seriously don't care? I hope it's the former and not the latter because as Tyler said that's the reason were in the crapper. It makes me think about how people complain and whine about how they don't like the democrat, republican, independent, libertarian, or whatever that's in office, but they are the main ones who never vote or take the time to listen to the candidates on their policies and agendas so they can voice their opinions on who they trust to look out for them. I'm not saying you have to love the practice of politics, but I wouldn't take an attitude of completely discouraging myself away from it, you wouldn't want just any lunatic to walk off the street and be in charge and responsible for you and everyone's future in your city, state or country. 
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Mr. Rainman on November 03, 2010, 05:32:34 PM
@Martin's reaction to my statement about California.

I must have confused a few people. I'm saying I'm surprised that for a while, the republican candidate put up a strong fight against Boxer. I'm not surprised at all that California kept a Democratic senator.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 03, 2010, 06:36:17 PM
Rick "The Crook" Scott is now our governor, and Rubio is our senator.   :thumbdown: Once a Republican state, always a Republican state.  :hammer:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Zach on November 03, 2010, 11:30:08 PM
Rick "The Crook" Scott is now our governor, and Rubio is our senator.   :thumbdown: Once a Republican state, always a Republican state.  :hammer:
Honestly, Sink did her best, but less than 50,000 votes away... oh well. Im towards democratics myself but for the senate I went for Christ. Good job to both though  :)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 04, 2010, 01:26:09 AM
@Martin's reaction to my statement about California.

I must have confused a few people. I'm saying I'm surprised that for a while, the republican candidate put up a strong fight against Boxer. I'm not surprised at all that California kept a Democratic senator.
Ohhhh :P that makes sense!
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Bryan on November 05, 2010, 04:25:31 PM
I'm so glad it's over with.  It's nothing but, personal attacks, saying what you want to hear to get your vote and everyone of them is a damn liar.  I did not vote.  They only care about one thing, themselves.  :thumbdown:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCmatthew on November 05, 2010, 07:02:16 PM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Charismatic Applesauce on November 05, 2010, 07:03:42 PM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?
I doubt Obama is going to be one of them.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 05, 2010, 07:11:15 PM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 05, 2010, 08:50:40 PM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)

She seriously is not fit to be President and no I'm not saying that because she's a republican, she acts more like she's a celebrity than she does a serious politician to me.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Tyler on November 05, 2010, 10:23:04 PM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)
Why are you doubting that? At this point it would surprise me if she didn't run.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 06, 2010, 01:50:34 AM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)
Here is what Sarah Palin is doing... she is neither denying nor confirming her presidential run because she knows she can keep up the media hype and interest that way. There is no way she will win a presidential run and everybody knows that. She really is a somewhat clever person and knows how to make $$$ off of her political views. I think she is smart enough not to run for office.
she acts more like she's a celebrity than she does a serious politician to me.
So does Obama in that regard. Appearing on The View, The Late Show, The Daily Show, Mythbusters, Oprah isn't very presidential imo <_<

In other unrelated election news.... Keith Olbermann has been suspended  :worship: :worship:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCmatthew on November 06, 2010, 08:35:23 AM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)
Here is what Sarah Palin is doing... she is neither denying nor confirming her presidential run because she knows she can keep up the media hype and interest that way. There is no way she will win a presidential run and everybody knows that. She really is a somewhat clever person and knows how to make $$$ off of her political views. I think she is smart enough not to run for office.
she acts more like she's a celebrity than she does a serious politician to me.
So does Obama in that regard. Appearing on The View, The Late Show, The Daily Show isn't very presidential imo <_<

In other unrelated election news.... Keith Olbermann has been suspended  :worship: :worship:
Obama was on the Daily Show? The comedy one? How unprofessional...  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 06, 2010, 08:59:47 AM
I know it's WAY early, but does anyone have an idea of the 2012 Presidential candidates?

I'm hearing rumors that Sarah Palin wants to run for president. (totally doubt that.)
Here is what Sarah Palin is doing... she is neither denying nor confirming her presidential run because she knows she can keep up the media hype and interest that way. There is no way she will win a presidential run and everybody knows that. She really is a somewhat clever person and knows how to make $$$ off of her political views. I think she is smart enough not to run for office.
she acts more like she's a celebrity than she does a serious politician to me.
So does Obama in that regard. Appearing on The View, The Late Show, The Daily Show isn't very presidential imo <_<

In other unrelated election news.... Keith Olbermann has been suspended  :worship: :worship:

True on the fact that I don't really understand why he would appear on The Daily Show, but it's not like he's the first politician to appear on a late night show.Ana was talking about Palin, not Obama which is why I brought that up. She can't even give a straight answer about a 2012 run, she has to beat around the bush by saying stuff like "Oh, I don't know if no one else better is running, I think it's something I should do." Either you want to run or you don't.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 06, 2010, 01:55:31 PM
True on the fact that I don't really understand why he would appear on The Daily Show, but it's not like he's the first politician to appear on a late night show.Ana was talking about Palin, not Obama which is why I brought that up. She can't even give a straight answer about a 2012 run, she has to beat around the bush by saying stuff like "Oh, I don't know if no one else better is running, I think it's something I should do." Either you want to run or you don't.
He is the first president to do so many talk and tv shows though. Anyway you missed my point. If Palin comes out and says "Yes I am running" or "No I am not running" political interest in her would go way down. By not admitting what she is really doing she keeps the media suspense and hype around her going strong. Its a political move so that she stays in the spotlight and people keep talking about her.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 06, 2010, 02:03:10 PM
I find the left's obession with Sarah Palin (and other female conservatives) to be quite fascinating (and often hilarious). I swear, this woman can't do anything without them blowing a gasket. Listening to some of them, you'd think she was the queen of the United States or something. They obsess over her "tweets," analyze her new haircut, and hyperventilate when she spends more than a dollar on anything. Who cares!? She's just a woman that has helped a few candidates win. She has no power over anyone's life. None!

And as for whether or not she will run for president. It's two years away. It's a big decision to make. I wouldn't expect any rational politician, except the maybe the current president, to decide something like that so early. If and when she decides to run, we can talk about it. But until that happens, let it go. :)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 06, 2010, 02:04:45 PM
I find the left's obession with Sarah Palin (and other female conservatives) to be quite fascinating (and often hilarious). I swear, this woman can't do anything without them blowing a gasket. Listening to some of them, you'd think she was the queen of the United States or something. They obsess over her "tweets," analyze her new haircut, and hyperventilate when she spends more than a dollar on anything. Who cares!? She's just a woman that has helped a few candidates win. She has no power over anyone's life. None!
Hehe amen! :yes:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 06, 2010, 04:31:45 PM
I would have liked the Democrats to retain both the house and the senate, but you can't get things you're way everytime. I think a lot of Democrats screwed themselves over, by not rallying behind the President fully, and in many ways, echoing the attitudes of the right.  :club:  However, I am still very glad the senate is still in Democratic power.   :) The Republicans have been talking a lot, so it's up to them to (literally) put their money where their mouths are.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCC_DJK5555 on November 06, 2010, 09:36:18 PM
I doubt Obama is going to be one of them.

I think Hillary's going to knock him out in the primaries.   :biggrin:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 06, 2010, 09:43:25 PM
I doubt Obama is going to be one of them.

I think Hillary's going to knock him out in the primaries.   :biggrin:

Dream on. Hillary had her chance in 08, and she didn't then. She already ruled out 2012.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 06, 2010, 09:57:35 PM
I would have liked the Democrats to retain both the house and the senate, but you can't get things you're way everytime. I think a lot of Democrats screwed themselves over, by not rallying behind the President fully, and in many ways, echoing the attitudes of the right.  :club:
In liberal areas, yes, that is probably true. But in moderate Democrat and Republicans areas, they went with the president too much. And that is/will be their downfall. Our Democrat Senator, Ben Nelson, is a prefect example of that. Even Democrats (in Nebraska) are not happy with his vote for the healthcare takeover.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 06, 2010, 10:49:57 PM
I would have liked the Democrats to retain both the house and the senate, but you can't get things you're way everytime. I think a lot of Democrats screwed themselves over, by not rallying behind the President fully, and in many ways, echoing the attitudes of the right.  :club:  However, I am still very glad the senate is still in Democratic power.   :) The Republicans have been talking a lot, so it's up to them to (literally) put their money where their mouths are.
Or the democrats screwed themselves by rallying behind the president.

Do you not see any problems with one party controlling the house, senate and presidency? Balance my friend is key
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: phw115wvwx on November 06, 2010, 10:53:16 PM
Right now, I just want all the politicians to quit worrying about political power and focus on fixing all the issues in this country.  If they don't, they won't have to worry about power as they'll all be voted out in 2012, and I can almost guarantee it just by glancing at all the 2010 results.  Honestly, it's been getting harder and harder for me over the past decade to find anyone worthy of my vote.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 06, 2010, 11:07:53 PM
I would have liked the Democrats to retain both the house and the senate, but you can't get things you're way everytime. I think a lot of Democrats screwed themselves over, by not rallying behind the President fully, and in many ways, echoing the attitudes of the right.  :club:
In liberal areas, yes, that is probably true. But in moderate Democrat and Republicans areas, they went with the president too much. And that is/will be their downfall. Our Democrat Senator, Ben Nelson, is a prefect example of that. Even Democrats (in Nebraska) are not happy with his vote for the healthcare takeover.

How come it wasn't a problem when Republicans overhwhelming and unabashedly supported everything the Bush administration did, even when it put the country at deep risk? How come this wasn't a question, then?
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: Anistorm on November 06, 2010, 11:33:33 PM
Right now, I just want all the politicians to quit worrying about political power and focus on fixing all the issues in this country.  If they don't, they won't have to worry about power as they'll all be voted out in 2012, and I can almost guarantee it just by glancing at all the 2010 results.  Honestly, it's been getting harder and harder for me over the past decade to find anyone worthy of my vote.

Amen. That's one of the reasons why I quit being a democrat and joined a third-party.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: toxictwister00 on November 07, 2010, 08:53:47 AM
Right now, I just want all the politicians to quit worrying about political power and focus on fixing all the issues in this country.  If they don't, they won't have to worry about power as they'll all be voted out in 2012, and I can almost guarantee it just by glancing at all the 2010 results.  Honestly, it's been getting harder and harder for me over the past decade to find anyone worthy of my vote.

Amen. That's one of the reasons why I quit being a democrat and joined a third-party.

Ironically, that's how long it's been since my state Georgia has been a "Blue State", it changed to Red and has stayed that way since Clinton left office.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 07, 2010, 02:39:51 PM
Right now, I just want all the politicians to quit worrying about political power and focus on fixing all the issues in this country.  If they don't, they won't have to worry about power as they'll all be voted out in 2012, and I can almost guarantee it just by glancing at all the 2010 results.  Honestly, it's been getting harder and harder for me over the past decade to find anyone worthy of my vote.
They wont be voted out if people just think every politician is evil and give up voting. I see that sentiment going around here and in the country. It is sad. The corrupt politicians truly win at that point when the American public gives up voting.

Personally I say if you don't vote you probably shouldn't complain. Even if both candidates are corrupt, go in there and cast a ballot for a write in or third party candidates. Stronger support for third party candidates often helps straighten out  the major parties by adopting some of the third party candidates ideas. Write ins are not always going to fail either... just look at Alaska!

Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 07, 2010, 04:32:38 PM
How come it wasn't a problem when Republicans overhwhelming and unabashedly supported everything the Bush administration did, even when it put the country at deep risk? How come this wasn't a question, then?
It was a problem. Democrats took over in 2006 due to the reckless behavior of the Republicans. Everything was going fairly well until the Iraq war. Once it became obvious that Sadam was bluffing about WMDs, the war became an issue that divided the country. It was because of that (and spending) that people went back to the Democrats. Same thing happened again in 2008. They also elected Obama, under the misguided notion (I admit that I was duped too) that he was a centrist and would put an end to corrpution and "the poltics of the past." Instead, he took what Bush was doing and ran with it. In the case of spending, he not only ran with it, he doubled the speed! He supported/pushed bills and ideas that were not popular with most Americans (like the healthcare bill and sucking up to our enemies). As a result, most people voted Republican this time. Not because they had faith in the Republicans again, but because it was their only other choice. They were voting against Obama, not for Republicans. Now we (conservatives) just need to make sure that they follow through on their promises.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCC_DJK5555 on November 07, 2010, 08:29:28 PM
Do you not see any problems with one party controlling the house, senate and presidency? Balance my friend is key

Three words:  Checks And Balances.   :biggrin:

America typically operates better under a divided government. 
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 07, 2010, 09:00:22 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCC_DJK5555 on November 07, 2010, 09:07:06 PM
Democrats took over in 2006 due to the reckless behavior of the Republicans. Everything was going fairly well until the Iraq war. Once it became obvious that Sadam was bluffing about WMDs, the war became an issue that divided the country. It was because of that (and spending) that people went back to the Democrats. Same thing happened again in 2008. They also elected Obama, under the misguided notion (I admit that I was duped too) that he was a centrist and would put an end to corrpution and "the poltics of the past." Instead, he took what Bush was doing and ran with it. In the case of spending, he not only ran with it, he doubled the speed! He supported/pushed bills and ideas that were not popular with most Americans (like the healthcare bill and sucking up to our enemies). As a result, most people voted Republican this time. Not because they had faith in the Republicans again, but because it was their only other choice. They were voting against Obama, not for Republicans. Now we (conservatives) just need to make sure that they follow through on their promises.


That sums it up perfectly.  The midterms of 1994 put an end to Bill Clinton's big government tendencies, and I'm sure the new electees are hell bent on doing the same thing to Obama.  Too bad nobody stopped big government Bush when they had the chance.   :angry:

I never bought into Obama's 'ending corruption' claim.  Remember, he is a CHICAGO politician, and that machine pretty much wrote the book on political corruption.

Oh, and according to Wikileaks, Saddam may not have been bluffing after all. (http://www.examiner.com/law-enforcement-in-national/wikileaks-saddam-s-wmd-program-existed-iraq)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: twcclassics on November 07, 2010, 10:39:05 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:

LOL. Relax. The election was less than a week ago. It's going to take some time to reverse what they've done. We gave your side 4 years, the least you can do is return the favor.

Elections Have Consequences (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_m06sSoZ5bo#ws)
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 07, 2010, 10:49:18 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:
LOL. Relax. The election was less than a week ago. It's going to take some time to reverse what they've done. We gave your side 4 years, the least you can do is return the favor.

Sure, whatever you say. We shall see. Time will tell.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCC_DJK5555 on November 09, 2010, 07:49:17 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:

Democrats still control the Senate and the Presidency, so technically they still have the overall majority.

Republicans have the House majority, but it's not a 2/3 vetoproof majority, so Obama can very easily stop them.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TampaMillTWC88 on November 09, 2010, 07:50:11 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:

Democrats still control the Senate and the Presidency, so technically they still have the overall majority.

Republicans have the House majority, but it's not a 2/3 vetoproof majority, so Obama can very easily stop them.

Good point.
Title: Re: Election Day Discussion & Coverage
Post by: TWCToday on November 09, 2010, 10:30:00 PM
Well, it is time to put up or shut up. The Republicans have been running their yaps a lot, so lets see them back it up with actual plans that can help the American people. The clock is ticking.  :yes:

Democrats still control the Senate and the Presidency, so technically they still have the overall majority.

Republicans have the House majority, but it's not a 2/3 vetoproof majority, so Obama can very easily stop them.
Basically what we have now is the potential for a lot of nothingness to happen. Funny how the democrats start talking about compromise when they loose power. Nancy Pelosi for years has been public about not giving in and working with the republicans at all. Both sides need to shove it and try to cooperate. Hope their egos can allow for some of that.