June 05, 2024, 05:53:08 AM

Author Topic: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage  (Read 20939 times)

Offline WeatherWitness

  • Andy
  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4638
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • WxStar Version: Satellite
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #45 on: October 28, 2010, 09:43:26 PM »
Interesting how some other viewers are thinking the same thing about the "corruption" of TWC as we are. :thrilled: I like it how Jim's angry post about the movie from April was brought up as well as the mention of another viewer who also didn't like movies on TWC.

Hopefully, this :censored: :censored: Peacock Productions idiot (oh, how I wish she could see how much I hate her) wasn't telling the truth or exagerating.

But it does confuse me...to see two completely contradicting sides. Is TWC defintely going pro-long-form or pro-live coverage?? :wacko:

phw115wvwx

  • Guest
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #46 on: October 28, 2010, 11:20:32 PM »
It seems to me that no one is sure what to do with TWC's future.  We can't go all the way back to the past as things have completely changed since the 1980s.  However, we can't just abandon the past completely as there are lots of useful elements that established TWC's roots, which can still be incorporated for the future.  It really sounds like we're at a crossroads here with these two clashing viewpoints.

I personally think the best answer is in the middle.  Live coverage is important, and there should be a minimum number of hours devoted each day for it no matter what's happening.  If the weather is active, then more time should be used for live coverage.  Furthermore, the quality of long-form time needs to be improved.  Focus on creating shows that reflect back on recent weather events, prepare us for an upcoming season, or commemorate anniversaries of memorable weather.  Overall, there needs to be far more emphasis on education in both live coverage and long-form time.  Most of the public has no clue how the weather works, and it would create more interest if they explained how and why things worked more often instead of just casually breezing through the weekly planner or showing a long-form episode that's only for "eye candy" purposes.  So, there's my idea.

Offline Charismatic Applesauce

  • Nice and mushy.
  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • Gender: Male
  • A tu lado.
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Xfinity
  • HD Channel #: 270
  • SD Channel #: 30
  • SD WxStar ID #: 21813
  • WxScan Ch. #: 116
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #47 on: October 29, 2010, 10:01:27 AM »
It seems to me that no one is sure what to do with TWC's future.  We can't go all the way back to the past as things have completely changed since the 1980s.  However, we can't just abandon the past completely as there are lots of useful elements that established TWC's roots, which can still be incorporated for the future.  It really sounds like we're at a crossroads here with these two clashing viewpoints.

I personally think the best answer is in the middle.  Live coverage is important, and there should be a minimum number of hours devoted each day for it no matter what's happening.  If the weather is active, then more time should be used for live coverage.  Furthermore, the quality of long-form time needs to be improved.  Focus on creating shows that reflect back on recent weather events, prepare us for an upcoming season, or commemorate anniversaries of memorable weather.  Overall, there needs to be far more emphasis on education in both live coverage and long-form time.  Most of the public has no clue how the weather works, and it would create more interest if they explained how and why things worked more often instead of just casually breezing through the weekly planner or showing a long-form episode that's only for "eye candy" purposes.  So, there's my idea.
That, my friend, is an awesome idea! :thumbsup:
iWitness   YouTube   Twitter   Facebook
Neither rain or shine will keep a man from making an ass of himself on the news. —Anderson Cooper

Offline twcclassics

  • Classic TWC Expert
  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6756
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
    • TWC Classics
  • Cable Provider: DirecTV
  • HD Channel #: 362
  • WxStar Version: Satellite
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #48 on: October 29, 2010, 10:39:44 AM »
It's been discussed many times before, but I think it's worth repeating...

Have two channels. One for people that use TWC for weather information and another for people who don't wanna think. One with 24/7 weather and another for weather reality, oh excuse me, ACTUALITY TV! :P
TWC Classics Webmaster
https://twcclassics.com

Offline Charismatic Applesauce

  • Nice and mushy.
  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • Gender: Male
  • A tu lado.
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Xfinity
  • HD Channel #: 270
  • SD Channel #: 30
  • SD WxStar ID #: 21813
  • WxScan Ch. #: 116
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #49 on: October 29, 2010, 10:56:44 AM »
iWitness   YouTube   Twitter   Facebook
Neither rain or shine will keep a man from making an ass of himself on the news. —Anderson Cooper

Offline Joe The Dragon

  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
    • View Profile
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #50 on: February 03, 2011, 10:59:16 PM »
they should get rid of the repeated late night forecasts and run a long LOT8's or a weather scan like setup on the main channel over night.

Offline Donovan

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1646
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Dish Network
  • SD Channel #: 214
  • WxStar Version: Satellite
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #51 on: February 03, 2011, 11:08:16 PM »
they should get rid of the repeated late night forecasts and run a long LOT8's or a weather scan like setup on the main channel over night.
It doesn't really matter b/c the main forecasters go home during the night, so the forecast data doesn't really get updated until they get back in the mornings and make a new forecast.

Offline twcc_hdayejr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Time Warner
  • HD Channel #: 1370
  • HD WxStar ID #: ?
  • SD Channel #: 56
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #52 on: June 04, 2011, 01:51:47 PM »
Storm Stories, Twist of Fate, Weather Caught on Camera, and Storm Riders aren't bad programs and very much weather related. Garbage like Epic Conditions, Weather Ventures, and Peter Lik(which sucks :D) are things that belong on Travel Channel. NBC is part owner of that channel and should move those dookie stains over there

Offline Anistorm

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4098
  • Gender: Female
  • I'm fabulous.
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Dish Network
  • HD Channel #: 5367
  • SD Channel #: 214
  • WxStar Version: Satellite
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #53 on: June 04, 2011, 04:32:46 PM »
Storm Stories, Twist of Fate, Weather Caught on Camera, and Storm Riders aren't bad programs and very much weather related. Garbage like Epic Conditions, Weather Ventures, and Peter Lik(which sucks :D) are things that belong on Travel Channel. NBC is part owner of that channel and should move those dookie stains over there

I see your point there. But my main concern is that they show those programs too much, and especially during hours that weather coverage is really necessary.
hi~ I'm Anistorm.
I'm not a girl, nor a woman. I am a lady.
Member since 2008.
I like thunderstorms.
I'm a moderator at another forum, so my
activity is not as awesome as you think.
Ask for my skype, tumblr and/or twitter.

Offline WeatherWitness

  • Andy
  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4638
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • WxStar Version: Satellite
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #54 on: June 04, 2011, 04:51:17 PM »
One show that I would often watch on TWC was Tornado Road. It's probably considered one of the Travel Channel-related ones, but at least it had something to do with weather.

IMO, Peter Lik is the one that really needs to go. :thumbdown:

Offline TampaMillTWC88

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1261
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • SD Channel #: 119
  • WxScan Ch. #: 49
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #55 on: June 04, 2011, 10:51:18 PM »
Storm Stories, Twist of Fate, Weather Caught on Camera, and Storm Riders aren't bad programs and very much weather related. Garbage like Epic Conditions, Weather Ventures, and Peter Lik(which sucks :D) are things that belong on Travel Channel. NBC is part owner of that channel and should move those dookie stains over there

I see your point there. But my main concern is that they show those programs too much, and especially during hours that weather coverage is really necessary.

It seems that these programs aren't preempted unless there is a tornado or other really serious weather event. I was disgusted when I turned to TWC today, when there actually was severe weather, with warnings in the midwest, TWC went on with its regularly scheduled programming.  :nono: Peter Lik is the worst idea TWC has come up with, and that's saying a lot, because there have been several bad ideas since 2008.  :wacko:
« Last Edit: June 04, 2011, 10:53:59 PM by TampaMillTWC88 »
Hakeem: What's up, Jetsons!
Frank Mitchell: Jetsons?
Hakeem: Yeah, you and George got the same haircut.

- From "Moesha"

Offline TampaMillTWC88

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1261
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • SD Channel #: 119
  • WxScan Ch. #: 49
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #56 on: June 05, 2011, 01:17:49 PM »
I really want to see how TWC and their stubborn and arrogant entertainment/reality agenda are going to handle the hurricane season, if it is as active as predicted.
Hakeem: What's up, Jetsons!
Frank Mitchell: Jetsons?
Hakeem: Yeah, you and George got the same haircut.

- From "Moesha"

Offline wxmediafan

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1635
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Xfinity
  • SD Channel #: 57
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #57 on: June 05, 2011, 01:21:37 PM »
I really want to see how TWC and their stubborn and arrogant entertainment/reality agenda are going to handle the hurricane season, if it is as active as predicted.
I am sure that in the case of a US landfall, they will preempt programming. 

Offline TampaMillTWC88

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1261
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • SD Channel #: 119
  • WxScan Ch. #: 49
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #58 on: June 05, 2011, 01:30:24 PM »
I really want to see how TWC and their stubborn and arrogant entertainment/reality agenda are going to handle the hurricane season, if it is as active as predicted.
I am sure that in the case of a US landfall, they will preempt programming.
I hope so, because they don't sure don't cover severe weather like they used to, unless tornadoes occur or are forecasted. Yesterday, there was severe weather, with warnings in the midwest. They continued to show programming, only with the update every 30 min. A few days ago, the same situation happened. There were strong thunderstorms somewhere, and during the update the OCM (can't remember who it is) casually said "there could be damaging winds and some hail" as if it's no big deal. They then continued with regularly scheduled programming.  :hammer:
Hakeem: What's up, Jetsons!
Frank Mitchell: Jetsons?
Hakeem: Yeah, you and George got the same haircut.

- From "Moesha"

Offline Eric

  • Ultimate Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1757
    • View Profile
  • Cable Provider: Other
  • WxStar Version: IntelliStar
Re: TWC Revamp: Strong Chance Of Less Weather Coverage
« Reply #59 on: June 05, 2011, 02:37:28 PM »
Hopefully they learned from their "Flick and a Forecast" fiasco last year.