TWC Today Forums

Present - The Weather Channel 2000 => Programming and Graphics => Topic started by: ABC7 on November 12, 2008, 09:38:53 PM

Title: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: ABC7 on November 12, 2008, 09:38:53 PM
Why is TWC is just like every network that they loved to overrun their below-decent programming. There is no reason for two hours during the day to be taken by It Could Happen Tomorrow. Who wants to watch those shows? I have no problem with one hour in the weeknights with long-form programming, but not the same When Weather Changed History episode!!!

TWC, get your head back in the game and cut down on long-form programs!
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Travis(: on November 12, 2008, 10:30:23 PM
Thats what ive been saying for 3 years now. :angry:
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Localonthe8s on November 13, 2008, 01:01:04 PM
They never will.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Mike on November 13, 2008, 05:34:26 PM
TWC's original concept was and still should be round the clock weather coverage. There are too many long form programs now that are cutting into coverage time, especially on weekends. This is most annoying when storms are affecting your given area and you have to wait through the duration of the program(s). I do enjoy some of them but it has gotten excessive. It's just a thought but maybe TWC could create another separate Channel (like WeatherScan) where programs, specials or whatever would run 24 hours per day.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: jtmal0723 on November 13, 2008, 05:43:21 PM
If there's a significant update, like during a snow storm for instance, your intellistar will cut into the program and show the clip, with the OCM saying "We're interrupting the program to bring you this update..."
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Localonthe8s on November 13, 2008, 05:47:34 PM
TWC's original concept was and still should be round the clock weather coverage. There are too many long form programs now that are cutting into coverage time, especially on weekends. This is most annoying when storms are affecting your given area and you have to wait through the duration of the program(s). I do enjoy some of them but it has gotten excessive. It's just a thought but maybe TWC could create another separate Channel (like WeatherScan) where programs, specials or whatever would run 24 hours per day.
Exactly. TWC should focus on their national weather programming and LFs. WxScan was made as a 24hr Lot8s version. TWC can make another seperate channel devoted to longform programming. The Environment Network is a channel that shows 24 hour weather and climate related series, and longform in Canada. TWN is a 24 hour channel w/national weather coverage and local forecasrs.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: wstarcraze on December 26, 2008, 10:14:43 PM
Or maybe TWC should show very few commercials like they did back in the 80s.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: jtmal0723 on December 26, 2008, 11:12:46 PM
Or maybe TWC should show very few commercials like they did back in the 80s.
That's not going to happen. They make a lot of revenue off of the commercials shown.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: LOT8MANIS on December 28, 2008, 01:15:13 AM
TWC's original concept was and still should be round the clock weather coverage. There are too many long form programs now that are cutting into coverage time, especially on weekends. This is most annoying when storms are affecting your given area and you have to wait through the duration of the program(s). I do enjoy some of them but it has gotten excessive. It's just a thought but maybe TWC could create another separate Channel (like WeatherScan) where programs, specials or whatever would run 24 hours per day.

Actually, there already is a channel just like that called The Weather Channel Features Channel. It airs Storm Stories, Epic Conditions, and Weather Ventures. You can watch it online via the TidalTV internet TV player at http://www.tidaltv.com/. (http://www.tidaltv.com/.) When you go there, it will redirect you to http://beta.tidaltv.com/ (http://beta.tidaltv.com/) because they have an updated beta version of their player out. It's absolutely free. They do have a version of The Weather Channel itself to where you can watch it via the internet, but it's not the live satellite feed that everyone is looking for. This feed has pre-recorded forecasts from weather.com, which I think is ridiculous; Another reason why I don't use the TidalTV player. I'll be glad when that day comes when somebody finally comes up with the technology for an internet TV player that actually has the capability to receive TWC's live satellite feed (No WeatherSTAR required). Of course, I could be wrong about the requirements of a WeatherSTAR. I do know from what I've been reading in this forum is you only have to have a WeatherSTAR if you want to "localize" your forecast for a given area. For example, I live in Woodstock, GA, 25 miles north of Atlanta. If you use Woodstock for the forecast city then you would have to have any of WeatherSTARs that currently exist from Jr. to the IntelliSTAR. Surely, none of those are required for the live satellite feed. Would anybody who has closer ties on this forum to TWC like to contact them (if necessary) to see if the live satellite feed that's broadcasted on DISH Network, DIRECTV, Sky Angel IPTV (Internet-Protocol Television), and nameless satellite providers has a WeatherSTAR with it or not? If you the somebody that's interested, once you know something, would you please let me know? It would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. The link to the TidalTV player page is below.

http://www.tidaltv.com/ (http://www.tidaltv.com/)

EDIT on 1/17/2009 1:02 A.M.: Actually, I just went to the WeatherSTAR support page at http://support.weather.com/, (http://support.weather.com/,) clicked on "The Weather Channel® IntelliStar®" link, then I accessed the "Instructions for Setting the IntelliStar to the AMC-10 Satellite", and I came to the conclusion that DISH Network, DIRECTV, Sky Angel IPTV, and the nameless satellite providers all have IntelliSTARs; they're all on the AMC-10 Satellite Feed which would make it impossible for any Internet TV provider to stream The Weather Channel via the internet. Somebody feel free to please correct me if I'm wrong. For those of you who have TV Tuner cards, do you have to have your computer hooked up to your TV in order to receive The Weather Channel that way? I'm sure that there's some of you that have it on a cable company vs. the satellite provider. I cannot pick it up in my room right now which is in my parents' garage thus the closest TV would be upstairs in my parents' den. I do have a TV in my room, but it only has the Sky Angel IPTV (Faith Package). Or can you pick up The Weather Channel and other TV channels off the satellite without hooking the computer up to your TV? Please let me know. lfmusiclover, feel free to move this post into its separate thread if necessary. Thank you.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Spring Rubber on January 17, 2009, 02:09:39 AM
DirecTV and DISH both have an Intellistar hooked up to display the national LDL. (blue bar at the bottom of the screen during programming)

Are you suggesting trying to pull a DirecTV or Dish satellite signal straight to your computer? With the encryption they use, I don't think that's feasable.

...or are you talking about accessing the AMC-10 satellite feed from TWC with your computer? Again, I doubt that's possible.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: LOT8MANIS on January 18, 2009, 04:03:44 AM
    Spring Rubber, when you put it that way, I'm talking about accessing the AMC-10 Satellite Feed. I'm just a TV viewer and I'm not an expert about these things, but if you say it's impossible for somebody to access the AMC-10 Satellite Feed in the event he or she wanted to start an Internet TV provider that included The Weather Channel in it, then I take your word for it.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: Spring Rubber on January 18, 2009, 07:07:48 AM
I'm saying the average Joe couldn't (legally) pull down TWC's signal and broadcast it; they would need to strike a deal with TWC.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: wxmancanada on January 21, 2009, 02:40:08 AM
I got a $2,650.00 Motorola DSR-4550  (http://www.motorola.com/business/US-EN/DSR-4550_US-EN.do?vgnextoid=90c106da5e15d110VgnVCM1000008406b00aRCRD) receiver to get the AMC-10 signal. In most cases this is what you need to get the signal. You will not be able to get the signal without this special Motorola Satellite Receiver, your FTA card, or FTA box wont do the trick. No basic home set top box, or retail receiver will do the job. Again, it costs about $3k new for a reason.
Title: Re: I can't hold back any longer
Post by: WeatherSTARIII on January 25, 2009, 03:43:49 AM
Is it legal to use at home?